Cases 21 - 30 of 44
FOWLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00020
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHANNON FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHANNON v. USA
as 1:2019cv00199
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RANCE JAMES SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yuri Stoyanov v. Raymond Mabus
as 19-1502
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCHER MACY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Commander of NSWC, WILLIAM SNYDER, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 20 Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YURI J. STOYANOV
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00870
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KOLVA v. MCGREW et al
as 4:2016cv00691
Plaintiff:
PETER J KOLVA
Defendant:
C MCGREW, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHANNON v. R AND J TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC F/K/A R AND J TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
as 7:2015cv00229
Defendant:
R AND J TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC F/K/A R AND J TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gay et al v. Fastenal Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00059
Plaintiff:
James Shannon Gay and Michelle G. Gay
Defendant:
Fastenal Company, Inc. and Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Javier Pellecer v. Miguel Gutierrez et al
as 2:2014cv04959
Defendant:
Eric Crosson, Miguel Gutierrez and James Shannon
Plaintiff:
Javier Pellecer
Stoyanov v. Mabus et al
as 1:2013cv00141
Plaintiff:
Yuri J. Stoyanov
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, James H. King, Wayne Weikert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
