Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Weber et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07026
Plaintiff:
Pamela Weber and James Weber
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Black v. Falconstor Software, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04632
Plaintiff:
Theresa Black
Defendant:
Falconstor Software, Inc., ReiJane Huai, Wayne Lam and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Bensley v. Falconstor Software, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04572
Plaintiff:
Robbie Bensley
Defendant:
Falconstor Software, Inc., Reijane Huai, Wayne Lam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boaz Q Balenti v. Scott McManus et al
as 8:2010cv01159
Plaintiff:
Boaz Q Balenti
Defendant:
City Of Anaheim, City of Anaheim Police Department, City of Buena Park and others
Weber v. Bailey et al
as 3:2010cv00317
Plaintiff:
Robert Worth James Weber, II
Defendant:
Chip Bailey and Als Brown
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Broussard v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Jelmar Broussard
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge and James Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Giishig v. Hanners et al
as 0:2010cv00546
Plaintiff:
Ozhawaaskoo Giishig
Defendant:
David Hanners, Kathleen Heaney, Barbra Berg-Windels and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv10361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sieverding, et al v. Colorado Bar Assn, et al
as 1:2002cv01950
Plaintiff:
Kay Sieverding, David Sieverding , Ed Sieverding and others
Defendant:
Colorado Bar Association , Steamboat Springs, City of , American Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
