Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Rogers et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31517
Plaintiff:
Connie Rogers and Jeff Rogers
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riley et al v. Muhammad et al
as 3:2013cv02766
Plaintiff:
Nathan Riley and Alejambra Tilley
Defendant:
Abubakar Muhammad, Aleda Menchyk, Wallace Dittsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-14921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-14897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rogers et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv08905
Plaintiff:
Connie Rogers and Jeff Rogers
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gibson et al v. Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01040
Plaintiff:
Carla Gibson , Windell Lawson , Joyce Powell and others
Defendant:
Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Biolab, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Burris v. Singleton et al
as 1:2013cv01007
Plaintiff:
Nicholas P. Burris
Defendant:
Ham Singleton, Mark Klappenbach and Jeff Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RAY v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK T. RAY
Defendant:
JEFF ROGERS, DAVID MITCHELL, COI HARKLEROAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.