Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Jeffrey Thurman v. Nathan Cain, II, Warden
as 15-30519
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY KEITH THURMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHAN B. CAIN, II, WARDEN, AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Garrett v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Keith Garrett
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Thurman v. Avoyelles Correctional Center
as 3:2014cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Keith Thurman
Defendant:
Warden Avoyelles Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spencer v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2013cv00334
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Keith Spencer
Respondent:
R. Bigelow, Utah State Board of Pardons and Parole, Clark A. Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv04726
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY KEITH JOHNSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 6:2012cv02033
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Keith Johnson
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Gajevic et al
as 1:2009cv01019
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Keith Bell
Defendant:
Bodo Gajevic and Scott Marlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
as 2:2009cv00979
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Keith Bell
Respondent:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Jeffrey Harper
as 08-4131
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY KEITH HARPER, a/k/a Jay
Smith et al v. Baker et al
as 4:2007cv00563
Plaintiff:
Ray Allen Smith and Alice Arlene Smith
Defendant:
Jeffrey Keith Baker and Circle S Transport LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
