Cases 21 - 30 of 42
USA v. Jeremy Roberts
as 19-6337
Defendant / Appellant:
JEREMY ROBERTS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Holm LLC et al v. Garfield County et al
as 4:2019cv00056
Defendant:
Garfield County, Leland Pollock, David B. Tebbs and others
Plaintiff:
Holm LLC and Star 77
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrell v. Maciol et al
as 9:2019cv00160
Defendant:
Tim Alm, Richard Lutz, Scott Eberhart and others
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Transfer of Offender pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4100 et seq.
as 1:2018mc00291
Defendant:
Justin Edward Garagan, Felicia Samoana Lemusu, Arlene Catherine Rose and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. Jensen et al
as 0:2018cv00709
Plaintiff:
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jessica M. Jensen , Elaine Pierce , Timothy Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2017cv00893
Petitioner:
Jeremy Robert Howard
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pogue v. Krewson et al
as 4:2017cv00221
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Robert Pogue
Defendant:
Jesse Krewson, Jeremy Floyd and Mike Wiford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golloway v. The Board of Trustees of Auburn University et al (MAG2)
as 3:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Sunny W. Golloway
Defendant:
The Board of Trustees of Auburn University , Jay Jacobs , David Benedict and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CHILDS v. LAMAR COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00325
Plaintiff:
JASON CARTER CHILDS
Defendant:
LAMAR COUNTY GEORGIA, LAMAR COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, JEREMY ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00050
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
JEREMY ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
