Cases 21 - 30 of 427
Bell v. Ramirez
as 23-931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Renzer Bell
Defendant / Appellee:
Stalin Ramirez, AKA Jose Stalin Ramirez, Kevin Marshall and Jane Doe
Defendant:
JSR Enterprises, LLC
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21024
Plaintiff:
JOSE LUIS RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramirez Rodriguez v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Ramirez Rodriguez
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez-Ramirez v. USA
as 3:2023cv01126
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Ramirez-Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
GARCIA-RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11318
Plaintiff:
JOSE GARCIA-RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Jose Ramirez Romero
as 23-11188
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE RICARDO RAMIREZ ROMERO
Botero-Navarro et al v. Taylorsville, City of et al
as 2:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Karol Johana Botero-Navarro and Jose Manuel Ramirez-Medina
Defendant:
Taylorsville, City of, Brady Cottam and Scott Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Perez-Ramirez
as 23-20121
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Perez-Ramirez
Ware v. Wind Transport Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ware
Defendant:
Jose Francisco Ramirez', SB Transport, Inc. and Wind Transport Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
