Cases 21 - 30 of 174
(PC) Bradford v. DeJesus et al
as 2:2021cv01411
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
S DeJesus, C Hernandez, Mary Dang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul v. Rushing et al
as 8:2021mc00060
Plaintiff:
Elena Paul
Defendant:
K. Bailey, State of Florida, Karen Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Paul v. Rushing et al
as 8:2021cv00983
Plaintiff:
Elena Paul
Defendant:
K. Bailey, State of Florida, Karen Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MARTIN v. INCH et al
as 5:2021cv00049
Defendant:
MARK INCH, ANGEL CANDELARIA, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD K MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The People of the State of Illinois et al
as 3:2021cv03024
Defendant:
Leroy K Martin, Jr, Carol M Howard and The People of the State of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Helene Tonique Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JJK MINERAL COMPANY II, LLC v. MORRIS et al
as 2:2020cv02025
Defendant:
DANIEL M. LINES, RACHEL L. RODDY, JACLYN SERSLAND and others
Plaintiff:
JJK MINERAL COMPANY II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grady v. Couthey et al
as 3:2020cv00682
Defendant:
FNU Rogers, Eddie Couthey, FNU Dennis and others
Plaintiff:
Tracey Terrell Grady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06458
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARELLE K MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannon Bey et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 2:2020cv00373
Defendant:
Guzman, Robert Dyckman, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cannon:Bey, People of the United States of America Republic and Christopher Cannon Bey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ROBINSON v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2020cv02390
Plaintiff:
DAXTRELL ROBINSON
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JOHN DOE and K. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
