Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Nolan v. Clarke et al
as 2:2018cv00552
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Barry Marano, Vandermark and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene D. Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Denny Lovern, The v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02573
Defendant:
HEIDI LANTZ, JENNA WALTER, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARLA DAILEY, THE ESTATE OF DENNY LOVERN, Darla (I) Dailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Berryhill
as 7:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Lovern Washington
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Nolan v. Clarke et al
as 7:2018cv00408
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Nurse Mays, Sergeant Tisdale and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene D. Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaia Botanicals, LLC v. Pacific Payment Technologies, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00789
Defendant:
Pasha Sollinger, Pacific Payment Technologies, LLC, Neil Haboush and others
Plaintiff:
Gaia Botanicals, LLC and Bluebird Botanicals
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Easley v. Chautauqua County NY et al
as 6:2018cv06326
Plaintiff:
Stephen Easley
Defendant:
Chautauqua County NY, Chautauqua County Jail, Loverne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovern v. Citibank N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv00471
Plaintiff:
Prescott Lovern, Sr.
Defendant:
Citibank N.A. and Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lovern v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2017cv00849
Plaintiff:
Anthony Earl Lovern
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Securities and Exchange Commission v. N1 Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv23618
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
N1 Technologies, Inc., NanoSave Technologies, Inc., Rockey "Roc" G. Hatfield and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Lovern v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv09400
Plaintiff:
Alma Jean Lovern
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
