Cases 21 - 30 of 55
NORMAN v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv08416
Plaintiff:
JORDAN M. NORMAN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv09569
Plaintiff:
Addie M. Norman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jeffrey Norman v. David Elkin, et al
as 16-2164
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFREY M. NORMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID W. ELKIN, RICHARD M. SHORIN, ELKIN GROUP INC and others
Jeffrey Norman v. David Elkin, et al
as 16-1924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY M. NORMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID W. ELKIN, RICHARD M. SHORIN, ELKIN GROUP INC and others
DONNEFELD v. PETRO HOME SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv00882
Plaintiff:
M. NORMAN DONNEFELD
Defendant:
PETRO HOME SERVICES, PETRO HOLDINGS, INC. and PETRO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scheveck v. City of Boise et al
as 1:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Scheveck
Defendant:
City of Boise, David G Frederick, David S Kaurin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BMO Harris Bank NA v. Rapp et al
as 2:2015cv02095
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank NA
Defendant:
Kevin M Rapp and Kathleen M Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Bank v. Max Keith Norman Residential Design, Inc. et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 2:2015cv00736
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank
Defendant:
Max Keith Norman Residential Design, Inc. , Max Keith Norman and Hope M. Norman
Counter_claimant:
Max Keith Norman Residential Design, Inc. , Hope M. Norman and Max Keith Norman
Counter_defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norman v. Elkin et al
as 3:2015mc00098
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Norman
Defendant:
David W. Elkin, Richard M. Shorin and Elkin Group, Inc
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
Norman v. Warren County Court et al
as 1:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
Brandyn M Norman
Defendant:
Warren County Court, Mary Elizabeth Velde and Bruce Snell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
