Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Open Rivers Media Group Inc., et al v. Southern Film Regional Center, et al
as 16-14822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OPEN RIVERS MEDIA GROUP INC., d.b.a. Open Rivers Pictures, ALVIN WILLIAMS and TAMMY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN FILM REGIONAL CENTER LLC, DOMINIC NIC APPLEGATE, GATES INDUSTRIES LLC and others
USA v. Maurice Anderson
as 15-10630
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE ANDERSON
Anderson v. USA
as 3:2015cv01209
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Maurice Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Open Rivers Media Group Inc. et al v. Southern Film Regional Center LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00724
Plaintiff:
Open Rivers Media Group Inc. , Alvin Williams and Tammy Williams
Defendant:
Southern Film Regional Center LLC , Dominic Nic Applegate , Gates Industries LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Maurice Anderson v. Warden New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 15-1440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Crawford & Company v. Anderson et al
as 8:2014cv00343
Defendant:
Maurice Anderson and Anderson Claim Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Crawford & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
US v. Maurice Anderson
as 13-4886
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE ANDERSON, a/k/a Mo, a/k/a Mayor Mo
US v. Maurice Anderson
as 13-4320
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE ANDERSON, a/k/a Mo, a/k/a Mayor Mo
Anderson v. USA
as 4:2013cv00294
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Maurice Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rimmer et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv07848
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Rimmer and Quaneesha Rimmer
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Drake, Maurice Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
