Cases 21 - 30 of 125
Bowles v. Tennessee Department of Correctional - CCA et al
as 3:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mario Bowles
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correctional - CCA, Warden f/n/u Frink, Assistant Warden J. Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Mail Room Staff
as 5:2022ct03004
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lafon Murphy
Defendant:
Mail Room Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barnett v. Superintendent et al
as 4:2021cv01223
Plaintiff:
Brandon Barnett
Defendant:
Superintendent, Jamle Williams, Unknown McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Applegate v. Mail Room Staff
as 7:2021cv00101
Plaintiff:
Roy Applegate
Defendant:
Mail Room Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Cuitillar et al
as 5:2021ct03307
Plaintiff:
David Dwayne Perry
Defendant:
Dr. MD Cuitillar, Mrs. Wiggins, Dr. Nogo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burleson v. Pace et al
as 1:2021cv00857
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jedediah Burleson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Pace, Waco DPO-IV, Stephon Lightener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trent Young v. MDOC, et al
as 21-2889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRENT YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Employer, JASMINA MASSEY, Prisoner Counselor, KIRT MAHAR, Mail Room Staff and others
Moore v. Thurnau et al
as 2:2021cv00483
Defendant:
Michael Gower, M. Grant, K. Wiley and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Everett Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lauer v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2020cv01320
Plaintiff:
David Lauer
Defendant:
Safe Prisons SGT, Bobby Lumpkin, Major and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roland Mathis v. Joel Ziegler
as 20-7478
Defendant / Appellee:
P. A. ELLIS, RDAP MR. CARNELL, DR. EDWARDS and others
Defendant:
P. A. HUTCHISON, OFFICER JAMES, OFFICER WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND MATHIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
