Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Marvin v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv10778
Plaintiff:
Marvin Davis
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC D/B/A FRESENIUS, MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA , Fresenius USA, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Marvin Davis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnnie Howard v. John Palmer, et al
as 14-14910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNIE FITZGERALD HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PALMER and MARVIN DAVIS
SPRINGS v. TAYLOR et al
as 4:2014cv00529
Defendant:
ALEX TAYLOR , MARVIN DAVIS and STEVEN SINGER
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS SPRINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv11359
Plaintiff:
Adam Davis and Marvin Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Springs v. Taylor et al
as 3:2014cv00183
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Springs
Defendant:
Alex Taylor, Norman Thigpen, Marvin Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31991
Plaintiff:
Laureen T. Davis and Marvin Davis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Marvin Davi
as 13-4427
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARVIN DAVIS, a/k/a TR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00367
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Whittier v. Muhammed et al
as 2:2012cv02358
Plaintiff:
Justin Wayne Whittier
Defendant:
Aadil Muhammed, Brandon Myers, Adriana Selvies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
