Cases 21 - 30 of 171
Carter v. Haney et al
as 3:2021cv00229
Plaintiff:
David Carter
Defendant:
Kent Haney and Mary Carter Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19407
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA MARIE CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCFS & BB, Inc., et al v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast
as 3:2021cv00254
Plaintiff:
MCFS & BB, Inc., et al., Mary Carter Petersen, Peter E. Petersen and others
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCFS & BB, INC. et al v. PETERSEN et al
as 3:2021cv00252
Defendant:
MARY CARTER PETERSEN and Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast
Plaintiff:
MCFS & BB, Inc., et al. and PETER E. PETERSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. Wood et al
as 4:2021cv00192
Plaintiff:
Tony Anthony Griffin
Defendant:
Matthew Wood and Mary Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Julie Marie Carter
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carter v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00097
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. f/k/a Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd., Sandoz, Inc., Actavis LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pearl Marie Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19734
Plaintiff:
MARY CARTER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00100
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Christina Marie Carter
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
