Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Gaguski v. Weaver et al
as 1:2026cv03078
Plaintiff:
Rudolph S. Gaguski
Defendant:
Judge Brenda Weaver, D.A. Frank Wood, D.A. Mariane Kelakoska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2026cv01732
Plaintiff:
Christian Mathis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Cain v. Beshear et al
as 5:2026cv00145
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Gov. Andy Beshear, U.S. Government, State of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2026cv04061
Plaintiff:
Bret Mathis
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Glen Hollow Equities LLC v. Mathis
as 1:2026cv02822
Plaintiff:
Glen Hollow Equities LLC doing business as Glen Hollow
Defendant:
Jamar Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Mathys v. Estes et al
as 2:2026cv00599
Plaintiff:
Logan Mathys
Defendant:
The Honorable Jacob A Estes and Bellefontaine Municipal Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. Core Civic Inc et al
as 2:2026cv01518
Plaintiff:
David Mathis
Defendant:
Core Civic Inc, Desert View Hospital Alliance LLC, Anees Arshad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Polk County Sheriff's Operation Center
as 8:2026cv01461
Plaintiff:
Moses Aundrea Mathis
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Operation Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv04125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mathis v. Rocke
as 4:2026cv00416
Defendant:
Adam Rocke and Colonel (Ret.)
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jeffrey C. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
