Cases 1 - 10 of 2,902
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv09603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Mathis v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2024cv09283
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Johnetta Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
Landon S. Mathis
Defendant:
Tim Eads, Dickson County, Tennessee and Randall O. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 2302 Federal Whistleblowing Act / Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA)
Kessler (PS) v. Schroetlin et al
as 1:2024cv02604
Defendant:
Homeland security agents, officers, employees, servants, Grand County Sheriff Office, Tyler Mathis and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel S. Kessler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00667
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson et al v. Vance et al
as 1:2024cv04210
Defendant:
Russell Mathis, Jordan M. Vance and DeKalb County, Georgia
Plaintiff:
Mark A.C. Robinson and Jasmine M. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01128
Defendant:
Dr. Michael O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Louise Mathis
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mathis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Mathis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
