Cases 1 - 10 of 2,847
MATHIS et al v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
W. MATHIS and K. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Mathis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mathis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strawder v. Mathys
as 3:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Strawder
Defendant:
Linda L. Mathys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MATHIS v. JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
DAVID MATHIS, JR.
Defendant:
JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as MILLERS MERRY MANOR and MILLERS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATHIS v. MILLER'S ALE HOUSE
as 2:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
OLAMAE MATHIS
Defendant:
MILLER'S ALE HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Borne v. Home Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jason Borne
Defendant:
Home Bank, N.A., Stephen Damore, Newman, Mathis, Brady & Spedale, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Mathis v. 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC
as 2:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Mathis
Defendant:
99 Cents Only Stores, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mathis v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Eugenio S. Mathis
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Alisha Tafoya Lucero, Wence Asonganyi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Scott v. Everbridge, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc., David Henshall, David Benjamin and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
