Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv09637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Taylor v. McAdams et al
as 5:2026cv04139
Plaintiff:
Treyvon Taylor
Defendant:
Jeffrey S. McAdams and Megan Danielle Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Mathis v. Federal Express Corporation
as 8:2026cv04451
Plaintiff:
Dekeisha Mathis
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Mathis v. Hooks et al
as 1:2026cv06383
Petitioner:
David Mathis
Respondent:
Tyler Hooks and Morgan County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith #773449 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2026cv00262
Plaintiff:
Xavier Smith #773449
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder, Michelle Wealton, Heidi E. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07546
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mathis v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv06004
Plaintiff:
Shannon Mathis
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Mathis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2026cv00125
Plaintiff:
Christina L. Mathis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
