Cases 1 - 10 of 2,724
Mathis v. Stephens et al
as 2:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Dontae Mathis
Defendant:
Robert Stephens and Monica Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. Director of Accounting NDOC
as 2:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Dontae Mathis
Defendant:
Director of Accounting NDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mathis v. Amburgey et al
as 2:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Dontae Mathis
Defendant:
M. Amburgey, Esq. Peter Thunell, Jess Marchese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04507
Plaintiff:
Shunta Mathis and X. J.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc. and Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
RASPALDO v. SAWYER et al
as 2:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
JULIEN VICTOR RASPALDO
Defendant:
STEPHANIE M. SAWYER, ROBERTO VALDES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATHIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12036
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL MATHIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 8:2023cv02301
Plaintiff:
Marvin Mathis
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
King v. Edgcomb et al
as 1:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Jordan King
Defendant:
Jason Edgcomb, Jackie Mathis, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
