Cases 21 - 30 of 58,793
Despain v. Trojan Hose and Supply, Inc et al
as 5:2024cv06074
Plaintiff:
Angelique Despain
Defendant:
Trojan Hose and Supply, Inc, Trojan Rental and Matthew Reibe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mastriano v. Gregory et al
as 5:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mastriano
Defendant:
James Gregory, III, Roland Kuhn, Paul Mazerolle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BROWN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW BROWN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Reza v. United States of America - FBOP et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Matthew Reza
Respondent:
United States of America - FBOP and Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cleckler v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Joshua Matthew Cleckler
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
