Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,088
USA v. Michael Walworth
as 24-1131
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MICHAEL JAMES WALWORTH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00906
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00990
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
VANDUNK v. WARRICK COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff: EMORY A. VANDUNK
Defendant: WARRICK COUNTY, JIM SCHULER, GREG A. GRANGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onley v. Madden
as 24-426
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL JAMES ONLEY
Respondent / Appellee: RAYMOND MADDEN
Williams #394751 v. Perry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00232
Plaintiff: Gregory Williams #394751, Jr.
Defendant: Unknown Perry, Unknown Johnson, Unknown Voeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Monarez
as 2:2023cv02564
Petitioner: Michael James Martinez
Respondent: KJ Monarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Hicks v. Kahlon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02830
Plaintiff: Michael James Hicks
Defendant: P. Kahlon and S. Gates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Furlong v. USA
as 2:2023cv13277
Petitioner: Michael James Furlong
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burton Cummings et al v. Michael James Kale et al
as 2:2023cv09130
Plaintiff: Burton Cummings and Randolph Charles Bachman
Defendant: Michael James Kale, Garry Peterson, The Guess Who and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?