Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Hart v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00938
Plaintiff:
Ms. Danielle Larane Hart and Danielle Larane Hart
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
DAKE v. DANIELS
as 7:2019cv00094
Defendant:
Ms DANIELS
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE DAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntosh v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
as 1:2019cv00727
Defendant:
Walmart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ms. Danielle McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. HUNTER et al
as 3:2018cv16446
Defendant:
H/O MS. DANIELLE HUNTER, MR. STEPHEN JOHNSON and S.I.D. SCHLOSSELFELD
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leggitt v. Ruel et al
as 5:2018ct03313
Defendant:
Ms. Daniels, Tiffany Williams, Hearing Officer Leach and others
Plaintiff:
Terry W. Leggitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vandivere v. Mansukhani et al
as 5:2018ct03131
Plaintiff:
James Dow Vandivere
Defendant:
Andrew Mansukhani, Ms. Daniels and M. Van Sickle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Biton v. Verrilli
as 17-2791
Plaintiff:
Ms. Crystal Biton, AKA Saphyre M. Redford
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ms. Danielle Biton, AKA Daniel Bitton
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Beaton Verrilli, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of New York, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and others
Biton v. Verrilli
as 17-2789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ms. Crystal Biton, AKA Saphyre M. Redford and Ms. Danielle Biton, AKA Daniel Bitton
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Beaton Verrilli, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of New York, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and others
Biton et al v. Verilli et al
as 1:2017mc00803
Defendant:
AG of Maryland, AG of New York, Pam Bondi, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Crystal Biton and Ms. Daniel Bitton
GROSS v. ENGLISH et al
as 2:2016cv00127
Defendant:
MS. DANIELS, BILLY ENGLISH, HAMBLIN and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GROSS, III
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
