Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Gibbs et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv23046
Plaintiff:
Susan Rose Gibbs and Robert Gibbs
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibbs et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-23046
Plaintiff:
Susan Rose Gibbs and Robert Gibbs
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Gibbs v. Steele
as 4:2012cv02083
Petitioner:
Robert Gibbs
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
NISBET v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv60183
Plaintiff:
MARILYN J. NISBET
Defendant:
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC., ARCELORMITTAL MINORCA MINE, INC. , ARCELORMITTAL USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nisbet v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
Marilyn J. Nisbet
Defendant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc., Arcelormittal Minorca Mine, Inc., Arcelormittal USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SELDON et al v. GIBBS et al
as 2:2011cv06392
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SELDON and PATRICIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ROBERT GIBBS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Riches v. McChrystal et al
as 1:2010cv02120
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Stanley McChrystal, Richard Holbrooke, Mike Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tony Barrino v. Treasury of the United State
as 10-1674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY CURTIS BARRINO
Defendant - Appellee:
TREASURY OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, Administration, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and others
Barrino v. United States Treasury et al
as 3:2010cv00171
Plaintiff:
Tony Curtis Barrino
Defendant:
United States Treasury, US Government Administration, Timothy Geithner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
