Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Johnson et al v. Direct Mail Holding Management, LLC
as 6:2014cv01041
Plaintiff:
Shirley A. Johnson and Randal A Johnson
Defendant:
Direct Mail Holding Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2012cv02310
Plaintiff:
Randall M Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Mitchem et al
as 2:2012cv04024
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Randall Glyn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 3:2010cv06323
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Randall L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Clements et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv00149
Plaintiff:
Wayne Clements, Hoyt Clements, Jr. and Kenneth Clements
Defendant:
Randall V. Johnson and Kenneth B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Green v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Norma J Green
Defendant:
Randall V Johnson and Kenneth B Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Schulze v. CAP Collection JV7, et al
as 07-51019
Debtor - (null):
In the Matter of: RANDALL M SCHULZE, Doctor of Chiropractic
Appellant:
RANDALL M SCHULZE, Doctor of Chiropractic
Appellee:
CAP COLLECTION JV7, RANDALL B JOHNSON, CA PARTNERS and others
Craig et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2007cv00543
Plaintiff:
Yvette Craig, Brian Tilton, Dusty Tilton and others
Defendant:
Randall F. Johnson, Ryan Phillips, Thomas Mindar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
