Cases 21 - 30 of 1,215
Ransom v. Officer Taylor Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Ransom
Defendant:
Officer Taylor Moore, Officer Andrew Anderson, Officer Matthew Barnwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Ransome v. F&E Aviation Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2024cv20287
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Ransome
Defendant:
F&E Aviation Holdings, Inc. doing business as Feam Aero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Sammy Belle v. , et alIn re: Sammy Belle v. , et al
as 24-1125
Petitioner:
In re: SAMMY D. BELLE
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
BARNES v. GIBSON et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS BARNES
Defendant:
JAKAYLA GIBSON, RANSOM, A. SEGARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BELLE v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
SAMMY D. BELLE
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM, LARRY KRASHNER and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benton v. DePiero et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lamar Benton
Defendant:
F. DePiero, J. Rawlings, P. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. RANSOME A MALE NATIVE et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
DANIELL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
RANSOME A MALE NATIVE, RANSOME MALE NATIVE SUBORDANT, MS. HARDGOOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ransom v. Wardlow et al
as 1:2023cv01283
Petitioner:
Jamauri Ransom
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow and Jonathan Skrmetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv04629
Plaintiff:
Laryssa M. Lee
Defendant:
Olivia Smith, Legacy Ransom and Kendra Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
