Cases 21 - 30 of 135
The Boeing Company v. Ten Oaks Management, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00481
Plaintiff:
The Boeing Company
Defendant:
Ten Oaks Management, LLC, Andrew Lovrovich, David Richeson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
David Meyers v. Muriel Pitney
as 22-7044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MURIEL-THERESA PITNEY, Clerk, DONALD LEMONS, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia, BETH COBELL, Sussex I State Prison Warden and others
Dale Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04982
Plaintiff:
Bob Williams, Dale Nichols, Kelly Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Staton v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00854
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, John Bowen, Oullette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Dale Nichols, Kelly Nichols, Kathleen Nickol and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00769
Plaintiff:
Nichols, Bob Williams, Dale Nichols and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Richeson v. Weiser
as 1:2022cv01370
Plaintiff:
David Allen Richeson
Defendant:
Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. VDOC et al
as 7:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
VDOC, H.W. Clarke, R.C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Pitney et al
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Muriel Pitney, Donald Lemons, Beth Cobell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sosa v. Richeson
as 22-381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Robert Richeson, Kathleen Maurer, individually and officially, Kirsten Shea, individually and officially and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
