Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Harris et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv14299
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Incorporated , General R.V. Center, Incorporated and Citizens Bank, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Harris and Annie R. Love-Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Harris, IV v. Sandra Va
as 10-7135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. HARRIS, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDRA VASS, Head Nurse of Medical Department, W. J. TOWNLEY, Superintendent and GENE JOHNSON, Director of D.O.C. and the Medical Director
Harris v. Vass et al
as 7:2010cv00327
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Harris, IV
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, W. J. Townley and Sandra Vass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Vass et al
as 2:2010cv00337
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Harris, IV
Defendant:
Sandra Vass, W. J. Townley and Gene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2010cv00701
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Burton v. Harris et al
as 3:2009cv05773
Plaintiff:
Lance W Burton
Defendant:
Robert L Harris, Mary Jo Harris and Clark County Commissioners Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Warden Townley
as 2:2009cv00192
Petitioner:
Robert L. Harris, IV
Respondent:
Warden Townley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Harris et al
as 3:2008cv05772
Plaintiff:
Lance W Burton
Defendant:
Robert L Harris, Mary Jo Harris and Board of Clark County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carr v. Reed et al
as 3:2007cv05260
Plaintiff:
Brian P Carr
Defendant:
Sam Reed, Rob McKenna, Robert L Harris and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HARRIS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2007cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HARRIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
