Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Davis v. Santander Consumer USA Inc
as 4:2021cv00942
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Davis
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Inc doing business as Chrysler Capital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Santander Consumer USA
as 3:2021cv02323
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Inc doing business as Chrysler Capital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1667
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ragans et al v. NAR Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00076
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA doing business as Chrysler Capital, NAR Services, NAR Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Valenica, Malcolm Eastlack Ragans and Miguel Valencia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Israel Salazar v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00607
Plaintiff:
Israel Salazar
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Inc. d/b/a Chrysler Capital Chrysler Capital LLC, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and Santander Consumer USA Inc. doing business as Chrysler Capital Chrysler Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00532
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00435
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
