Cases 21 - 30 of 176
US v. Andrew Wilson
as 22-7422
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson
Wilson v. USA
as 5:2022cv00501
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Pace v. Graves et al
as 5:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Pace
Defendant:
Mandy Graves, Matthew Quimby, Dr. Shawnie Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. McCracken Co. Jail Medical Staff et al
as 5:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
McCracken Co. Jail Medical Staff, P.A. Shawna and Dr. Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TREECE v. WILSON PIZZA COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv01757
Plaintiff:
Larry R Treece and LARRY R. TREECE
Defendant:
Wilson Pizza Company and Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
White v. Lewis et al
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Lance Christopher White
Defendant:
Mike Lewis, Sergeant Brandon Lampton, Janet Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. United States of America
as 5:2022hc02138
Petitioner:
Scott Wilson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Andrew Wilson
as 22-4344
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson
Browder v. Hopkins County, KY et al
as 4:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Browder, Jr.
Defendant:
Hopkins County, KY, Mike Lewis, Dr. Scott Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY
as 2:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
SCOTT WILSON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY as owner and operator of JOHN J. KANE REGIONAL CENTER GLEN HAZEL d/b/a KANE COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
