Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Matusak v. Daminski et al
as 6:2021cv06058
Defendant:
Deputy Stephen Murphy, Sgt. Brian Unterborn and Deputy Matthew Daminski
Plaintiff:
Christopher Matusak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. The City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2020cv00514
Defendant:
Christopher Nakamoto, Shanard Carey, East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien v. Murphy et al
as 1:2020cv00153
Defendant:
Adam Robinette, Ripley County Sheriff's Department and Stephen Murphy
Plaintiff:
Edward James Martin O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. MURPHY
as 3:2020cv00116
Defendant:
SUZANNE MURPHY and VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00803
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Atchafalaya Basinkeeper et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2020cv01106
Plaintiff:
Healthy Gulf, Atchafalaya Basinkeeper and Louisiana Crawfish Producers Association - West
Defendant:
Colonel Stephen Murphy, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Captain Ryan McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 19-30277
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BATON ROUGE, JAMES WEBER, S. CAREY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 3:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Pat Magee, East Baton Rouge Parish, S Carey and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Phillip Littler v. Blake McDonald, et al
as 18-2471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP M. LITTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE MCDONALD, STEPHEN MURPHY, ISRAEL BREWER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
