Cases 21 - 30 of 77
(PC) Waddell v. Minton et al
as 2:2020cv00307
Defendant:
A. Minton, D Haynes, S. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Waddell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Mercado et al
as 1:2020cv00111
Defendant:
T Ross, Sara Revell, . Kirby and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Mercado et al
as 1:2019cv01415
Defendant:
T Ross, . Williams, Sara Revell and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pines v. Holloway et al
as 5:2019cv05059
Defendant:
C Skaggs, Deputy Rubio, T Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Rory Bernett Pines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pines v. Holloway et al
as 4:2019cv00196
Defendant:
C Skaggs, T Ross, Roser and others
Plaintiff:
Rory Bernett Pines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv00702
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
DORETHA T. ROSS
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II) and PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROSS v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv15187
Plaintiff:
DASHON T ROSS
Defendant:
JOSH MORRISON and THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03278
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Charles T Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSS v. CLERK OF COURTS OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv05012
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL T. ROSS
Defendant:
CLERK OF COURTS OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, D. JUGLE and C. FORTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
