Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Burris et al v. M&M Bedding, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jason Burris , Thomas Lee Fox, Jr. and Anthony Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
M&M Bedding, LLC , Mohamed R. Maghari and Jeffrey M. Mowrey
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Spireon, Inc. v. Fox et al
as 1:2016cv04233
Plaintiff:
Spireon, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas E. Fox and Connected Telematics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fox v. Roy et al
as 0:2015cv02594
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Fox
Defendant:
Thomas Roy, Penny Malecha, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. MAHFOUZ et al
as 1:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT ELLIS BROOKS
Defendant:
NGA MAHFOUZ, MARY MCGOWAN, CHRIS PIAZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv09412
Plaintiff:
Alma Jo Fox and Thomas S. Fox
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Grant Adams, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-5026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grant O. Adams, Jimmy R. Anderson, Jose R. Arias and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Troy G. Avera, Jeffrey M. Bales, Michael W. Ballard and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Raymond L. LaHood, Secretary of Transportation and J. Randolph Babbitt, FAA Administrator
FOX v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
THOMAS F. FOX
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00304
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00037
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
