Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Nelson v. Schmitt
as 4:2015cv00125
Petitioner:
Timothy Nelson
Respondent:
David Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hinton et al v. North Carolina Industrial Commission
as 5:2014ct03302
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton, William Joseph Hurley, Montavious Antoine Johnson and others
Defendant:
North Carolina Industrial Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Joeseph Duran et al v. Chavez et al
as 2:2014cv02048
Plaintiff:
Estate of Joseph Duran , Steven A. Duran and Elaine Duran
Defendant:
Roy C. Chavez, Timothy Nelson, Jason R Strongman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Reeve
as 14-1056
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY NELSON REEVES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
KENNON v. NELSON et al
as 1:2012cv00153
Plaintiff:
EUGENE KENNON, JR
Defendant:
TIMOTHY NELSON and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowdrie et al v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al
as 1:2012cv00853
Plaintiff:
Angela Bowdrie, Sharon Brow, John L. Brown and others
Defendant:
Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., Sun Pharma Global, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Nelson v. United Recovery Systems, LP.
as 2:2011cv01836
Plaintiff:
Timothy Nelson
Defendant:
United Recovery Systems, LP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Timothy Butler v. Department of Correction
as 11-14432
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY NELSON BUTLER
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
United States v. Reeve
as 11-1200
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY NELSON REEVES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
