Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 43
VRM v. Browning
as 5:2015cv07748
Plaintiff: VRM
Defendant: Stanley Browning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VRM (Vendor Resource Management) v. Hennessy et al
as 4:2015cv00344
Plaintiff: VRM (Vendor Resource Management)
Defendant: Phillip Hennessy and Keith Berdine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALVAREZ v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association et al
as 2:2015at00522
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, a California corporation, VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT) DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, a Texas corporation and others
Plaintiff: JOHN ALVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
VRM (Vendor Resource Management) v. Muhammad
as 2:2014cv00634
Plaintiff: VRM (Vendor Resource Management)
Defendant: Azeezuddin Samad Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VRM v. Dias et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00783
Plaintiff: VRM
Defendant: Albert Dias, Jr and Jennifer Dias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VRM v. Dias et al
as 3:2014cv03128
Plaintiff: VRM
Defendant: Albert Dias, Jr and Jennifer Dias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HomeStar Property Solutions, LLC v. VRM Mortgage Services, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv03100
Plaintiff: HomeStar Property Solutions, LLC
Defendant: VRM Mortgage Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finnerty et al v. MidFirst Bank, VRM
as 2:2014cv12316
Plaintiff: Martin Finnerty and Tracy Finnerty
Defendant: MidFirst Bank, VRM
VRM (Vendor Resource Management) v. Love
as 1:2013cv03698
Plaintiff: VRM (Vendor Resource Management)
Defendant: Victor Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
VRM (Vendor Resource Management) v. Bailey-Wade
as 5:2013cv00809
Defendant: Rose Bailey-Wade
Plaintiff: VRM (Vendor Resource Management)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?