Cases 21 - 30 of 483
Moore v. National Vision, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Monika Moore and Monika R. Moore
Defendant:
National Vision, Inc. and National Vision, Inc. doing business as Americas Best Contacts & Eyeglasses
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Megha v. LCA-Vision Inc.
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
OD Anita Megha
Defendant:
LCA-Vision Inc. dba Lasik Plus and LCA-Vision Inc. doing business as Lasik Plus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Nolasco v. National Vision Inc
as 3:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rosario Nolasco
Defendant:
National Vision Inc doing business as America's Best Contacts & Eyeglasses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Rice v. Empact Vision Inc.
as 7:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Charles Rice
Defendant:
Empact Vision Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Foren v. LBC Optics Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jodi Foren
Defendant:
LBC Optics Inc and Wisconsin Vision Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Plumley v. Graybug Vision, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Defendant:
Graybug Vision, Inc., Christy Shaffer, Christina Ackermann and others
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. v. Alcon Inc.
as 23-1477
Appellant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON SURGICAL VISION, INC.
Appellee:
ALCON INC.
Franchi v. Graybug Vision, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Defendant:
Graybug Vision, Inc., Frederic Guerard, Christina Ackermann and others
MORGAN v. USV OPTICAL, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv07485
Plaintiff:
LACIE MORGAN
Defendant:
USV OPTICAL, INC. and U.S. VISION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
