Cases 21 - 30 of 1,620
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt v. Compton Cowboys, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02642
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
Compton Cowboys, Inc., Israel Houghton, Jekalyn Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Compton
as 24-2039
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LAMORSE COMPTON, JR.
COMPTON et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Warden BOBBY G. COMPTON and PAMELA COMPTON
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stewart v. Compton
as 4:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Phillip Dewayne Stewart
Defendant:
Cathleen Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. Compton
as 5:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Tatiana Lisa Compton and Tatiana Lisa Armstrong
Respondent:
Scott Compton
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 9001 et seq. (ICARA) International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Compton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Annette Compton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kevin M DeHoog v. Compton Sheriffs Train Div
as 8:2024cv00473
Petitioner:
Kevin M DeHoog
Respondent:
Compton Sheriffs Train Div
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Marcello Omar Cooper v. Compton Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01862
Petitioner:
Marcello Omar Cooper
Respondent:
Compton Superior Court and D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcello Cooper v. Compton Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01626
Petitioner:
Marcello Omar Cooper
Respondent:
Compton Superior Court and D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Crystal Compton
as 24-5197
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CRYSTAL COMPTON, D.O.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
