Cases 21 - 30 of 34,433
Rogers v. Ramos et al
as 8:2024cv01451
Plaintiff:
Rafel Rogers
Defendant:
Luis Efren Ramos, Jr. and Bernardo Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Columbia County et al
as 1:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Randy DeWayne Rogers
Defendant:
Columbia County, Columbia County Sheriff's Office, Michael Loe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Matthew Planer, et al. v. City of Pocatello, et al.
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Estate of Matthew Planer and Deborah Williams
Defendant:
City of Pocatello, Roger Schei, Rich Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wenger et al v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Micah Wenger and Tamara Wenger
Defendant:
Jared Blaine Johnson, Parker Montgomery, Jaci Latham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray Rogers v. Donald Wenk
as 24-6574
Plaintiff:
RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
Defendant:
DONALD WENK, ERIC EDWARDS, NATHANIEL BROTHERS and others
Northern Data NY, LLC v. Rogers
as 2:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Northern Data NY, LLC
Defendant:
Paul Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Salazar-Salazar (PS) v. Celia
as 1:2024cv01640
Petitioner:
Roger Javier Salazar-Salazar
Respondent:
Celia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Mitchell
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Tiger A Rogers
Defendant:
Mekel Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eklund v. Ross et al
as 2:2024cv11543
Plaintiff:
Richard Eklund
Defendant:
Richard Ross, Roger Caramanoff and Auto Konnect LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
