Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
William Pittman v. Metuchen Police Department, et al
as 10-4246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, VINCENT RUSSO and others
Vernon King, Jr. v. Steven Rich, et al
as 10-40522
Petitioner - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN N RICH, WILLIAM PITTMAN and BRAD LIVINGSTON, Director
William Pittman v. Metuchen Police Department, et al
as 09-4253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, ROBIN RENTENBERG and others
Mitchell v. Kroll et al
as 1:2009cv00775
Plaintiff:
Troy Edward Mitchell
Defendant:
Gene Kroll, William Pittman, Bobby Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Pittman et al v. Mertiage Mortgage Corporation et al
as 5:2009cv00700
Plaintiff:
William Pittman and Renita Cason
Defendant:
Mertiage Mortgage Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Harrison #188387 v. Pittman et al
as 1:2009cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Harrison #188387
Defendant:
William Pittman, Unknown Simpson, B. Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dan Coffman v. Karen Dennis, et al
as 09-40290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN COFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN L DENNIS, BRIDGHETT G EDDIE, Courtroom Clerk, WILLIAM PITTMAN, Disciplinary Captain and others
Coffman v. Dennis et al
as 1:2008cv00610
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Karen L Dennis, Bridghett G Eddie, William Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Summers v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2008cv00536
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, UTMB Medical, UTMB Medical and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
