Cases 31 - 40 of 13,115
Mathews v. Guinn et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Melvin Deandre Mathews
Defendant:
Sherri Guinn, Christian County Jail and Kenton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. ASHONG et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
LINDSEY DIANE BAKER
Defendant:
HELENA ASHONG, HOPE DE KREF, KATHY NICHOLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glassel v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Glassel
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Raccio and Sherri Fritter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Speaks v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Speaks
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hemminger v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Hemminger, Jr
Defendant:
Paul Nelson, Paulette Storie, Sherry Kness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herbert v. Espinal et al
as 1:2024cv03604
Plaintiff:
Sherry D. Herbert and Melvon E. Herbert
Defendant:
Christoph Espinal and ARS CARGO LOGISTIC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Credit Repair Organization Act
Trice et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Sherry M. Trice and Ronald Trice
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Herbert v. Espinal et al
as 1:2024cv03609
Other:
SHERRY D. HERBERT
Plaintiff:
MELVON E. HERBERT
Defendant:
CHRISTOPH ESPINAL and ARS CARGO LOGISTIC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 au Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
