Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Marino v. Beccera et al
as 3:2017cv05118
Plaintiff:
Daniel Marino
Defendant:
Xavier Beccera, Contra Costa County Department of Child Support Services, Alameda County Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riggs Drug Company, Inc. et al v. Owners Insurance Company d/b/a Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 3:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Riggs Drug Company, Inc. , Fannon Family Investments, L.P. , John F. Claiborne, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Owners Insurance Company d/b/a Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Burnett v. Arana, et al.
as 2:2016cv01630
Plaintiff:
Ester Burnett
Defendant:
J. Arana, J. Fannon, M. Goldy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fannon et al v. US Bank, National Association, Trustee
as 1:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
Catherine M. Fannon and William M. Fannon
Defendant:
US Bank, National Association, Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Peek v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 4:2016cv00498
Plaintiff:
James Peek
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 3 Member Parole Panel, Cynthia Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fannon et al v. Purcell Indian Health Clinic
as 5:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Fannon
Defendant:
Purcell Indian Health Clinic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Fannon et al v. US Bank, National Association, Trustee
as 1:2015cv00474
Plaintiff:
Catherine M. Fannon and William M. Fannon
Defendant:
US Bank, National Association, Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Fannon v. Flournoy
as 2:2015cv00104
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wayne Fannon
Respondent:
J.V. Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MacArthur v. Garden et al
as 2:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
Bret Golden MacArthur
Defendant:
Richard Garden, Kennon Tubbs, Aaron Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
