Cases 31 - 40 of 7,400
Hicks v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Keith S Hicks
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Courageous Home Healthcare, LLC
as 4:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hicks
Defendant:
Courageous Home Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Reddell v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Joyce Reddell
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Vitalcore Health Strategies, LLC, David Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Craft v. All Concepts, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ryan Craft
Defendant:
All Concepts, LLC, Fab Crew, LLC, Troy Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hicks v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03701
Plaintiff:
Yarnell Hicks
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and CCDOC Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
(PC) Rollen v. Hicks
as 2:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Van Keyshone Rollen
Defendant:
A. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craft v. All Concepts, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ashlyn Craft
Defendant:
All Concepts, LLC, MTW Cabinetry, LLC, All Concepts USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
