Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,634
John McDowell v. United Fire & Casualty Company
as 24-2345
Defendant: United Fire & Casualty Company
Plaintiff: John Harvey McDowell
Acosta Hurtado v. McDowell
as 24-3962
Petitioner: ELEAZAR ACOSTA HURTADO
Respondent: NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Ironwood State Prison
Randolph McDowell v. State of Maryland
as 24-6624
Respondent: BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF MARYLAND and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Petitioner: RANDOLPH MCDOWELL
(PC) Washington v. CDC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01784
Defendant: California Department of Corrections, P. Birdsong, Payne and others
Plaintiff: E- and Roderick Nathaniel Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolta v. Anagnost et al
as 4:2024cv03804
Defendant: Autodesk, Inc., Rami Rahim, Andrew Anagnost and others
Plaintiff: Lisa Kolta
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Cruz v. Amco Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00626
Defendant: Amco Insurance Company and Dyan McDowell
Plaintiff: Barbara Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
In re: Annemarie McDowell
as 2:2024rd00073
Plaintiff: Annemarie McDowell
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Woods et al v. McDowell Transport, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff: Angela Duff and Faith Woods
Defendant: Scott McDowell, McDowell Transport, LLC and Kimberly McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shah et al v. Anagnost et al
as 4:2024cv03451
Defendant: Autodesk, Inc., Rami Rahim, Andrew Anagnost and others
Plaintiff: Alpesh Shah
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Elzey v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2024cv00456
Defendant: Phylicia Hanford, Robert Thornton, Cantrell Guice and others
Plaintiff: Sorita Elzey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?