Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 9,165
Tucker v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00187
Petitioner: Cornez Tucker
Defendant: Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MEYER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff: MICHAEL G. MEYER
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Burrell v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00210
Plaintiff: Joel Aaron Burrell, Tyler Bly, Joshua Clamp and others
Defendant: David Anderson, A. King, J. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Board of County Commissioners of Adams County, Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff: Starr Rios
Defendant: Board of County Commissioners of Adams County, Colorado, Gene Caps, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Citibank, N.A. v. 88th Avenue Owner LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03730
Plaintiff: Citibank, N.A.
Defendant: 88th Avenue Owner LLC, 89th Avenue Owner LLC, Meyer Chetrit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
M. v. The City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv03001
Plaintiff: R. M. and Rachel Meyers
Defendant: The City of New York, Jess Dannhauser, Administration for Children's Services (ACS) of the City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00576
Plaintiff: Kim Meyer
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lettieri v. Daniels
as 24-1369
Plaintiff: DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant: JOEL L. DANIELS and CHERYL MEYERS BUTH
Lettieri v. Daniels
as 24-1372
Plaintiff: DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant: JOEL L. DANIELS and CHERYL MEYERS BUTH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?