Cases 31 - 40 of 31,441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wells et al v. Pennrose Management Company et al
as 1:2024cv01746
Plaintiff:
Torrie Wells, Briana Smith, Cherdi Deanille Henson and others
Defendant:
Pennrose Management Company and Newtowne 20, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Walter Vega v. State of Florida, et al
as 24-11971
Plaintiff:
WALTER VEGA
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ERIN HUGHES, CITY OF FORT MYERS and others
Myles v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv01710
Plaintiff:
Youn-Faa Oliver Myles
Defendant:
Paul A. Thompson, William K. Hammond and Clarence K. Lam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
AKINMADEYEMI v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv07003
Petitioner:
AKINTOLA AKINMADEYEMI
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STEWART v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06917
Petitioner:
ROSHAWN STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CELENTANO v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06998
Plaintiff:
RALPH CELENTANO
Defendant:
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, WARDEN R. THOMPSON, DR. SOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
ALPHEAUS SMITH
Defendant:
SAMANTHA THOMPSON and NOAH SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brock et al
as 2:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Matthew Leroy Allbaugh, Craig Brewer, Michael Brock and others
Defendant:
City of Bellingham and Seth Fleetwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
