Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Brooks
as 3:2016cv06418
Petitioner:
Harold B. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton W. Marshall et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv06794
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Bedingfield, Mark A. Caylor, Michael Hardesty and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip B. Brooks, Manuel A Gonzalez, Thomas W Hall and others
BROOKS v. PF HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04034
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. BROOKS
Defendant:
PF HOLDINGS, LLC, JAWANA JOHNSON, LISA RAWLIGENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. State of Ohio
as 1:2016cv01049
Petitioner:
Leander B. Brooks
Respondent:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv11010
Plaintiff:
Karen B. Brooks and William Cary Brooks
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Bell et al
as 5:2015ct03097
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamont Robertson
Defendant:
N. Bell, B. Brooks, P. Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks et al v. Desarrollo e Investigacion Medica Aragonesa, S.L. et al
as 2:2015cv01746
Plaintiff:
Ann B. Brooks and Terry B. Brooks
Defendant:
Desarrollo e Investigacion Medica Aragonesa, S.L. , Neomedic International, S.L. , Neomedic Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS V. DARDZINSKI, ET AL
as 2:2014cv07474
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. BROOKS
Defendant:
KEVIN DARKZINSKI, EDWARD BUDDIN and THE BUREAU SQUAD OF THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Fosamax
as 14-2633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANN B. BROOKS and WILTON C. BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC
Brooks v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00492
Plaintiff:
Randall B Brooks
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
