Cases 31 - 40 of 456
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stanfield v. Puyallup, City of et al
as 3:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Kevin Stanfield
Defendant:
Puyallup, City of, Dean Johnson, Andrea Beall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beall et al v. The City of Morgantown
as 1:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lieutenant Mitchell Beall, Brandon Bailey, Joseph R. Bragg and others
Counter Defendant:
John Borzik, Lieutenant Charles D. Campbell, Michael Close and others
Defendant:
The City of Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Asphalt Trader Limited v. Beall, et al
as 22-4085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASPHALT TRADER LIMITED
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT SCOTT BEALL and TARYN CAPITAL ENERGY, L.L.C.
Bratten v. City of Great Falls et al
as 4:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen Bratten and Timothy Allen Braaten
Defendant:
City of Great Falls, Joseph Dusatko, Derek Mahlum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Braaten v. City of Great Falls et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Tina Michelle Braaten
Defendant:
City of Great Falls, Joseph Dusatko, Derek Mahlum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beall v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 3:2022cv00212
Petitioner:
Joshua Beall
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beall v. United States America
as 8:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Justin Beall
Defendant:
United States America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beall v. Douglas County Jail
as 8:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Justin Dean Beall
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
