Cases 31 - 40 of 359
Bailey v. Brun
as 3:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Earsel Delano Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edward MullinsIn re: Edward Mullins
as 23-5776
Petitioner:
In re: EDWARD DEAN MULLINS
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER BRUN
AMF Bruns America, L.P. v. Vantage Mobility International, L.L.C.
as 5:2023cv01634
Plaintiff:
AMF Bruns America, L.P.
Defendant:
Vantage Mobility International, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Flemming v. Brun
as 3:2023cv00703
Petitioner:
Nathan G. Flemming
Defendant:
Warden Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Davis v. Christopher Brun
as 23-5641
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER BRUN, Warden
Bruns v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
James Bruns
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Lenear v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lenear
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, McLeod County, Glencoe Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lenear v. State of Minnesota, The et al
as 0:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lenear
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, The, McLeod County, Officer Tyler Bruns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bruns et al v. Mathews Archery, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00165
Defendant:
Mathews Archery, Inc., Mathews Manufacturing, Inc., Mathews, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron W Bruns and Kylie D Bruns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bruns v. ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking
as 4:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bruns
Defendant:
ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
