Cases 31 - 40 of 48
J. Kevin Benjamin, et al v. Brent Brewer, et al
as 15-2070
Plaintiff:
SUPER PAWN JEWELRY & LOAN, LLC, doing business as GEMRUSH
Appellant:
J. KEVIN BENJAMIN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT BREWER, JOHN MONTAGUE, STEVEN BYLE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tower Insurance Company of New York v. Rose City Auto Group, LLC, et al
as 3:2014cv00975
Defendant:
Karen Bersine, Laney Blankenship, Teresa Byle and others
Plaintiff:
Tower Insurance Company of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Byles v. Caterpillar Inc et al
as 4:2014cv00086
Defendant:
Rodney McDougalle and Caterpillar Inc
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Byles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BYLES et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2013cv01279
Plaintiff:
JAMES BYLES , HEATHER PRICHARD and E. B.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Byle v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2013cv20693
Plaintiff:
Allyson Jill Byle
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Byle v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-20693
Plaintiff:
Allyson Jill Byle
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Byles v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing, LLC et al
as FLS/1:12-cv-21010
Plaintiff:
James Byles
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Distributing, LLC, Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co. and Proctor & Gamble Co.
Byles v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv21010
Plaintiff:
James Byles
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Distributing, LLC , Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company and Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
