Cases 31 - 40 of 163,984
Verhulst v. The City of Fort Myers, Florida
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Verhulst
Defendant:
The City of Fort Myers, Florida
Corp. et al v. City of Milton, Georgia
as 1:2024cv02538
Plaintiff:
Jimroze Corp. doing business as D'Rose Vintners, James Rosenberger and Daryn Rosenberger
Defendant:
City of Milton, Georgia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Doward v. City of Kettle River et al
as 0:2024cv02240
Plaintiff:
Monique Annette Doward
Defendant:
City of Kettle River, David C. Lucas, Kathryn M. Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CITY OF MARIETTA, GEORGIA v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv06949
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MARIETTA, GEORGIA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY & COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Barber v. Patznick et al
as 2:2024cv03195
Plaintiff:
Loren Barber
Defendant:
Chance Patznick and City of Newark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tabata v. City of Hanahan et al
as 2:2024cv03448
Plaintiff:
Luxolo Tabata
Defendant:
City of Hanahan, Mildred Rowell and Private First Class Goss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Zakkiyya Carter
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, Suicide Prevention and Crisis Services, Inc., Mia Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
