Cases 31 - 40 of 94
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2020cv02266
Defendant:
Charles Roger, Lura H Parsky, Peter Daddeh and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROGERS v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05971
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ROGERS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rogers v. Holloway et al
as 5:2019cv05229
Defendant:
Sheriff Shawn Holloway, Detective Matthew Cline and Northwest Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Charles Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Charles Rogers
as 19-4175
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES ROGERS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nancy Sussman, et al v. San Diego Police Department, et al
as 19-56329
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER BUERGEN, Esquire, GRETHEN HELM RONAS, MEDICAL EXAMINERS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SUSSMAN, Estate thereof by and thru his special administer for the estate and NANCY SUSSMAN
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv02380
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STUART CHARLES ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Hamilton County, Tennessee, Government et al
as 1:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Deputy Mike Mullins, John Doe, Deputy Nathan Fountain and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Charles Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keller v. Lindenhurst Fabricators, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06914
Plaintiff:
Michael Keller
Defendant:
Charles Rogers, Lindenhurst Fabricators, Inc., Rogers Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Charles Rogers v. Brian Foster
as 18-2669
Petitioner:
CHARLES ROGERS
Respondent:
BRIAN FOSTER, Warden
Day v. Cantellano et al
as 3:2018cv00232
Plaintiff:
Charles Roger Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Patricia Espinoza Cantellano, John S. Davis, Neil H. McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
