Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Nelson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03755
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NELSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. Truelove, et al
as 7:2020cv00244
Counter Plaintiff:
J&B Heavy Haul, Inc. and Robert Earl Truelove
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDGE v. HAWKINS et al
as 1:2020cv02668
Defendant:
JAMES BELL, MIKE HART, RYAN MEARS and others
Plaintiff:
VINSON L. EDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85810
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NELSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75781
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NELSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91169
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NELSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne v. Sheeley et al
as 5:2020cv00040
Respondent:
John Sheeley and Lawson
Petitioner:
Christopher Nelson Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv00537
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NELSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwin Ryan, Jr. et al v. Chino Valley Independent Fire District
as 5:2019cv01490
Plaintiff:
Keith Stroup, Rick Parpan, Leslie Kast and others
Defendant:
Chino Valley Independent Fire District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
