Cases 31 - 40 of 130
Rubin v. Exa Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv12050
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Defendant:
Exa Corporation, Stephen A. Remondi, John J. Shields, III and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Berg v. Nutraceutical International et al
as 2:2017cv00830
Plaintiff:
Robert Berg
Defendant:
Nutraceutical International, J. Kimo Esplin, James D. Stice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turner v. Natividad Medical Center et al
as 3:2017cv03992
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Turner
Defendant:
Natividad Medical Center, Christopher D. Burke, Robert M. Block and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Natividad Medical Center et al
as 1:2017cv00901
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Turner
Defendant:
Natividad Medical Center, Christopher D. Burke, Robert M. Block and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin et al v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Joe Austin and Michelle Wilson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, William H. Ruby, DO, Mina Ko, LPN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Louis v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Louis
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, E. L. Shipp, L. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Litsscher et al
as 2:2016cv01681
Plaintiff:
Reginald D Burke, Sr
Defendant:
Jon E Litsscher, David Melby, Lance Wiersma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Warden North Central Correctional Institution
as 2:2016cv01076
Petitioner:
Steven D. Burke
Respondent:
Warden North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burke v. Windstream Communications, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv01022
Plaintiff:
Jeffery D Burke
Defendant:
Does, Windstream Communications, Inc., Windstream Communications, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
