Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Bagby v. David,et al
as 5:2014cv00741
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
G. S. David, Deana R. Davis and D. Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Glenn
as 6:2014mc00013
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Garland D. Glenn, II
Glenn v. United States District of Milwaukee
as 2:2013cv00955
Plaintiff:
Randy D Glenn, Sr
Defendant:
United States District of Milwaukee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Jones v. Fulton Bank, N.A.
as 13-2034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. JONES and CHERYSE D. GLENN JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
FULTON BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.
Glenn v. Coleman
as 3:2013cv01090
Petitioner:
Altrovise D. Glenn
Respondent:
John Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Yellon et al
as 2:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Scott
Defendant:
Lawrence Norman Yellon, Bob Musser, H. Eric Vennes and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones et al v. Fulton Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Jones and Cheryse D. Glenn Jones
Defendant:
Fulton Bank, N.A. and Samuel I. White, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Burns Boyd v. D. Glenn, et al
as 12-11192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BURNS TILTON BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
D. GLENN, Bill Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas, DEANA R. DAVIS, Bill Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas and KENNETH C. HOLT, B
Glenn v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00886
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Robert D Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
STOUT STREET FUNDING LLC v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2010cv05634
Plaintiff:
STOUT STREET FUNDING LLC
Defendant:
OTIS JOHNSON, MABSTRACT, LLC, MABSTRACT MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
