Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Ochoa v. Esquivel et al
as 3:2014cv00062
Defendant:
D. Esquivel, D. Holland, S. Kimbrell and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Torres Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv02985
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Holland
as 12-4588
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Deborah D. Holland
Defendant - Appellant:
Albert E. Holland, Jr.
Lance Holland v. Harold Clarke
as 12-6820
Petitioner - Appellant:
LANCE D. HOLLAND
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director
Great Southern Bank v. Holland Corporation, Inc., The et al
as 2:2012cv02197
Plaintiff:
Great Southern Bank
Defendant:
Holland Corporation, Inc., The , MJH Venture, L.L.C. , Harry M. Holland and others
Counter_claimant:
Rita I. Holland , MJH Venture, L.L.C. , Harry M. Holland and others
Counter_defendant:
Great Southern Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holland v. Clarke
as 1:2011cv01306
Petitioner:
Lance D. Holland
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOLLAND v. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67221
Plaintiff:
OWEN D. HOLLAND
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC. , A W CHESTERTON COMPANY , CBS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLAND v. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67221
Plaintiff:
OWEN D. HOLLAND
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC. , A W CHESTERTON COMPANY , CBS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Holland et al v. Airco Inc et al
as 5:2011cv02189
Plaintiff:
Owen D Holland and Gregory A Legg
Defendant:
Armstrong International Inc, A W Chesterton Company , CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
